Why is CCM needed?
Start with real competition, self-interest, cooperation, and avoidable losses. Examine the problem before the tool.
Read the public introductory essay — Chinese source guide; English version not verifiedCOMPUTABLE COMPETITION–COOPERATION MECHANISMS · CCM
Can We Learn to Compete and Cooperate Better?
CCM neither asks people to abandon competition nor lets machines adjudicate fairness for them. Starting from real interests, it makes subjects, benefits, costs, third-party burdens, hard boundaries, and unknowns visible, bringing competition and cooperation earlier into a structure that can be challenged, corrected, and recalculated.
START WHERE YOU ARE
Five paths you can enter immediately
You do not need to accept the entire Civilization Leap theory or believe in CCM first. Start with a real problem, technical interest, or objection of your own.
Why not just use an AI?
AI provides cognitive capability; agents provide the ability to act. CCM addresses multiple subjects, third parties, hard constraints, UNKNOWN, evidence, and boundaries on wider adoption.
View the differences and boundaries — Chinese source guide; English version not verifiedRun it in five minutes
A zero-dependency reference evaluator. Reproduce the public teaching case first, then judge what can actually be computed.
Try the technical demonstrationBring a real problem
Failed cooperation talks, allocation rules, platform governance, resource burdens, agents affecting others: start with your own real problem.
Enter BYOPTest, challenge, improve
No endorsement is required. Recalculate, find counterexamples, implement independently, or identify representation gaps. Failure is also valid evidence.
Enter third-party testingOpen-source development and sharing
Fork, add domain extensions, submit counterexamples, or pass the method to another real-world user.
Open GitHubCCM IN PRACTICE · REAL MA 01
From railway mergers to intelligent logistics networks
Start with the proposed UP–NS merger: at comparable AI capability, what can independent cooperation achieve, what can ownership integration add, and who bears the benefits and costs?
How much waiting can AI remove from a shipment?
Follow a waiting shipment into opportunities for end-to-end logistics cooperation. See how CCM organizes options, evidence, and calculation, then bring your own question or counterexample.
This case is a public research proposal with hypothetical calculations and declared evidence gaps. It has not reached an empirical conclusion about the transaction's net effects.
AI ≠ AGENT ≠ CCM
CCM is not another smarter AI
AI
Good at observing, reasoning, generating, explaining, and calculating.
Agent
Good at planning, using tools, executing tasks, and achieving objectives.
CCM
Asks who receives what, who bears what, which boundaries must hold, what remains unknown, and whether new evidence requires pausing, downgrading, or renegotiating.
A 0.01 DIFFERENCE
Reality did not change. Why did the determination change?
In the shared-equipment teaching case, A and B each save 3, while third party C always loses 0.5. Changing the declared third-party protection ceiling from 0.5 to 0.49 flips the determination from SATISFIED to VIOLATED.
Machines can calculate
0.5 <= 0.49 Any program can answer precisely whether this holds.
Governance must keep asking
Why 0.49? Who has authority to draw that line? Did C, who bears the loss of 0.5, participate? Precise calculation does not establish legitimate rules.
REAL USE
Real progress means solving real problems, not writing more rules
CCM's immediate purpose is to help real subjects see interests, costs, third parties, hard boundaries, UNKNOWN, and irreversible consequences more fully, improving judgment and action. Stars, downloads, and readership can indicate reach; they cannot prove that real problems have been solved.
SEEN → UNDERSTOOD → TRIED → USED → CHALLENGED → ADAPTED → REUSED → EXTENDED
Sharing should lead to cycles of real use. Failures, counterexamples, resistance, and representation gaps also count as real-world evidence.
FROM USE TO CIVILIZATION
Why do these local changes ultimately relate to Civilization Leap?
You do not have to use CCM for the sake of Civilization Leap. Losing a little less, negotiating a better agreement, reducing friction within a team, or preventing an agent from optimizing only one side's interests are sufficient reasons.
But if more subjects start seeing others, third parties, unknowns, and irreversible consequences before acting, and better solutions enter contracts, platform rules, organizational processes, and public institutions, more than individual answers will change: our default way of handling problems will change.
Civilization is not a declaration. It is more people gaining another choice when facing conflicts of interest.
OPEN · REPRODUCIBLE · CHALLENGEABLE
Project anchors
GitHub
Open source under Apache-2.0. Independent forks, implementations, and domain extensions are permitted.
Open repositoryZenodo
Stable archive DOI for v0.1.0: 10.5281/zenodo.22656544.
View DOIEvidence discipline
Runnable does not mean solved; sent does not mean endorsed; external AI does not mean independent third-party validation; not found in a search does not mean absolute originality.
View testing and evidence notesTranslation scope
This page translates the complete existing public HTML text. Linked works and files retain their own publication and version boundaries; unavailable English materials are marked explicitly.