Historical diagrams and current framework

These verified English diagrams preserve the historical terminology and reading paths of P01-MAPS-001 V2.0. Their older wording and book titles do not replace the current formulation, “self-interest with others first,” the confirmed R10.10 collected master, or current Living Civilization titles. The current navigation links below remain separate from the historical diagrams.

Public entry to the Civilization Leap theory system — historical P01-MAPS-001 V2.0 diagram
Historical diagram 1 · P01-MAPS-001 V2.0. Original terminology and book titles retained.
Open full-size SVG in a new tab
Enlarge diagram here
Public entry to the Civilization Leap theory system — enlarged
Public entry diagram: Helps new readers see the problems of our era, civilizational forks, three goals, and practical foundations.
Nine dimensions of the Civilization Leap theory system — historical P01-MAPS-001 V2.0 diagram
Historical diagram 2 · P01-MAPS-001 V2.0. Original terminology and book titles retained.
Open full-size SVG in a new tab
Enlarge diagram here
Nine dimensions of the Civilization Leap theory system — enlarged
System panorama diagram: Shows relationships among theory, disciplinary inquiry, institutions and governance, future life, practical foundations, and enduring civilization. Interstellar and very long-term research belong to the later research layer of an open future; they are not mandatory primary tasks for the present stage.
Further reading in the Civilization Leap theory system — historical P01-MAPS-001 V2.0 diagram
Historical diagram 3 · P01-MAPS-001 V2.0. Original terminology and book titles retained.
Open full-size SVG in a new tab
Enlarge diagram here
Further reading in the Civilization Leap theory system — enlarged
Onward-reading navigation diagram: Helps different readers start from their own questions and enter suitable works and longer reading paths.
A note on time horizons

The system retains long-term and interstellar directions so that immediate realities do not close off the future. Current communication, public understanding, and practical judgment do not depend on mature interstellar proposals. The closer a proposal comes to implementation, the more it requires evidence, responsibility, exit, and rollback. The closer it lies to the very long-term future, the more clearly its research or visionary status must be marked.

PATH + PANORAMA

The path shows how to proceed; the panorama shows the extent of Civilization Leap

M1→M8 preserves the process through which the theory forms: starting from present crises and changing capabilities, moving through human value, purpose generation, institutions, validation, and future life, and finally returning to why civilization is worth continuing. The panorama does not invent new branches; it places existing theoretical bodies, problem domains, foundational capabilities, and practical foundations within one map of relationships.

Civilizational goals

Continued existence is the baseline, not the endpoint

Continued existence as the baseline → secure basic living conditions → happiness in life → lives richer in meaning. An open future and the ability to choose again run throughout.

View M8: What is it ultimately for?
Theoretical framework

The five-volume work + the Living Civilization trilogy

The five-volume work asks why change is necessary and which boundaries must hold. Living Civilization asks how a future civilization operates, how people live in it, and how it comes into being.

Explore how a future civilization operates and how people live
FOUNDATIONAL CAPABILITIES

Foundational capabilities are not permanently subordinate to any single branch

The following research and engineering already serve clear purposes in high-consequence questions such as continued existence and AGI governance. They also provide foundations for future Spark, Nebula, and wider civilizational operation. Their present use does not determine their permanent institutional home.

Human-COS

Make subjects, relationships, interests at stake, consequences, unknowns, and responsibility visible earlier. It currently serves high-consequence judgment; in the future, it may also support Nebula's public judgment and necessary high-consequence situations within Spark.

CCM

Place competition, cooperation, interests, costs, third parties, and unknowns within a comparable structure. It serves research on real strategic interactions and may also become a foundational capability for Nebula's public cooperation and institutional formation.

Purpose Generation

Investigate why objectives hold and how they are retained, revised, cancelled, replaced, and reopened. This connects autonomous AGI objectives with purpose generation in future long-term human–AI and AI–AI relationships.

AGI-COS

Currently addresses crisis operations, perception auditing, high-consequence permissions, and boundaries that permit rollback. Over time, it may develop further into a foundation for civilizational immunity and coordination in human–AGI–AGI relationships.

Irreversible closure / CI-001

Identify whether channels for correction, exit, refusal, recovery, and choosing again are being structurally closed. As a cross-cutting baseline criterion, it can apply to institutions, platforms, and future public structures.

Spark and Nebula

Spark supports the extension of human capabilities, the reach of care, and real responses. Nebula supports public cooperation, judgment among multiple subjects, and civilizational operation. They are not downstream of safety tools; they are important foundations for future civilizational life and public operation.

REAL-WORLD RELATION MECHANISMS

Competition and cooperation mechanisms: from civilizational direction to real relationships among multiple subjects

This is an open research undertaking within how to make the leap. It does not require every subject to abandon self-interest first. Instead, it compares the real consequences of cooperation, non-cooperation, competition, and coordination, making burdens on third parties, constraints, unknowns, and irreversible risks visible earlier.

Research on computable mechanisms of competition and cooperation

Research project entry point: purpose, methods, applications, current boundaries, and global open-source implementation.

Enter the research project

Can we learn to compete and cooperate better?

An introductory reflection: from making interests visible and comparing choices to enabling cooperation to generate verifiable trust.

Read the introductory reflection
PUBLIC / BACKSTAGE

The boundary between public completeness and internal completeness

What the public website presents

  • The complete theoretical system and causal relationships
  • Entry points organized by audience, problem, and domain
  • The responsibilities and boundaries of each manuscript family
  • An individual explanatory page for each current public work
  • Stable entry points for downloads, citation, and onward reading

What the public website does not present

  • Complete internal editorial and engineering governance documents
  • Transitional versions, working candidates, and cleanup drafts
  • Review logs, revision records, and AI collaboration processes
  • Targeted internal policy advice and manuscripts for unauthorized recipients
  • Original files that have not completed final public-release review

Translation scope

This page translates the complete existing public HTML text. Linked works and files retain their own publication and version boundaries; unavailable English materials are marked explicitly.