Resource pools
Distinguish ownership from actual use, allowing idle resources to serve public value under voluntary, auditable arrangements with the right to exit.
Earlier source terminology
The resource-pool card quotes the earlier V1.0 source, including its language of altruistic outcomes and compulsory translation of incentives. This differs from the current formulation, “self-interest with others first.” The source wording is retained for review; it neither cancels self-interest nor silently revises the original work. See the current resource-pool family for the relationship between the early exploration and later conceptual tracks.
AUDIENCE PATH
Institutions, Resources and Governance Engineering
How can resources, contribution, power and public value be reconnected in computable, auditable relationships?
Understand these connections first
Contribution-value system
Prevent real contributions from disappearing unnoticed, while making clear that contribution value is not a personal score and cannot purchase basic rights.
Separation of three powers and civilizational decision-making
Constrain the expansion of human and intelligent-system power by structurally separating the powers to propose, judge and execute.
Meaning economy
Study how participation, contribution, relationships and meaning can provide new social support under structural unemployment.
Suggested starting points
This sequence asks for no prior agreement. It offers a short route to enough understanding to continue judging for yourself.
Resources, contribution and institutional engineering
Civilization Leap: Resource-Pool Meta-Rules for the AGI Era
— The underlying logic of moving from selfish contests over existing stocks toward broadly beneficial altruistic outcomes. This document establishes meta-rules for resource allocation in Civilization Leap. It argues that as AGI drives exponential productivity growth, relations of production centered on selfishness, possession and monopoly over existing stocks obstruct the broad sharing of intelligence’s benefits. The architecture does not seek to reform subjective morality; it proposes one-way causal translation rules in the infrastructure of resource flows, compelling rational self-interested nodes’ motives for gain to yield objectively beneficial, strongly entropy-reducing social outcomes. It systematically discusses resources, contribution and the leap…
Why Civilization Leap
Underlying Principles of Civilization Leap
10.5281/zenodo.18553154. Answer: Yes, under current mainstream cosmological models, the universe’s most likely final fate is heat death. The second law of thermodynamics: entropy in a closed system increases toward a maximum — energy… [The source card excerpt ends here.]
How a future civilization operates and lives
Meaning Emergence, Volume I: Principles of Future Civilizational Operation
How future civilization operates and its basic forms in the AGI era. 10.5281/zenodo.21610691. Status: Volume I theoretical baseline / basis for writing Volume II.
For targeted research materials, policy interfaces, city proposals or media-development files, make a formal request through About and Collaboration. Targeted materials are not directly published in the public library.
Translation scope
This is a translation of the existing public web page. A description of a work is not its full manuscript. Source publication and version labels describe the Chinese work; they do not claim an English full-text edition is available. Unavailable English texts and downloads are marked explicitly.