Publication boundaries: This is a theoretical and prospective institutional-design work. Meaning in coexistence, shared self-interest, civilizational meaning maps and meaning-impact assessment are theoretical propositions, normative designs or prospective arguments. They must not be mistaken for completed global deployment, empirical validation or unified institutional authorization.

Version and identity

Version: Realist calibration edition

Role: Main topic text

Publication review: PASS_WITH_NOTE

Controlled source file: Formal Chinese DOCX: realist shared-self-interest calibration edition (original filename recorded in the Chinese source)

Publication integrity

Source-file integrity: PASS. The controlled source DOCX was materialized as original binary bytes and its hash reconciled.

Publication rendering: PASS. The source stable PDF completed all-page rendering checks.

Current state: The source PDF and DOCX stable download paths are active.

Questions addressed by this work

Conflicts beyond resources

Human conflict arises not only from resources, interests and power, but also when language, land, historical wounds, dignity, customs and future hopes are belittled or closed off.

Shared self-interest

Individuals, groups and states are not asked to abandon self-interest, but to reconsider it across longer time horizons, larger systems and higher-risk structures.

Meaning boundaries in the AGI era

As AI automates and scales classification, risk judgment and action, appeals, rollback, shutdown triggers, transfers of responsibility and precautionary protection of unknown meaning are needed.

Key institutional directions in the main text

These are theoretical and institutional reference frameworks, not a uniform compulsory scheme.

Civilizational meaning maps and translation of meaning

First identify what real subjects protect, what has hurt them and what they fear losing; then enter resource use, cooperation, repair and governance.

Protection against disregard and precaution for the unrecognized

For objects not yet understood, untranslatable or potentially carrying dense meaning, retain low intervention, reversibility and pauses in allocation. Do not treat the unknown as empty by default.

Shared tasks and contribution records

Build minimum trust through low-risk, verifiable, exit-capable and reversible shared tasks. Record real acts of support rather than ranking personal worth.

Meaning-impact assessment, appeals and rollback

Assess not only efficiency and resource consequences, but language, history, relationships, subject boundaries and the future’s accessibility, allowing stopping, correction and rollback.

Continue reading

Continue through theoretical foundations, neighboring mechanisms, real life and tests by counterexample; do not treat one topic as the entire framework.

Enter academic scrutiny · Return to the Meaning in Coexistence topic

Translation scope

This page translates the public web description. The reviewed English manuscript is available in the English PDF section below; its source edition is identified there.

English PDF

Download the English PDF · Formal edition · Realist Foundations and Shared Self-Interest Calibration