Reassessing Disciplines in the AGI Era: Disciplinary Boundaries, Interactions and a Shared Research Agenda
CL-ACA-005 · Interdisciplinary introduction · Historical Canonical V2.4. Public metadata and existing professional explanation only.
Full manuscripts and versions
Author-authorized full-text publication. Downloads below are separately verified files; website summaries are not manuscript translations. Publication restrictions printed in older source manuscripts are superseded by the author’s release decision of 16 October 2026; the academic text itself is unchanged.
- Chinese original · V1.3 · independent publication · PDF
- Chinese original · V2.4 · formal research · PDF
V2.4 formal research and V1.3 independent-publication edition are separate tracks of the same work; neither silently replaces the other.
No full English translation of the new Chinese edition has been verified. English pages remain English reading and continuation entries.
Current submission or peer-review status is not established by these publication files. Historical preparation and routing records do not establish an active review.
Asset identity
This page publishes the permanent identifier, Canonical version, disciplinary position and governance state. It is not the complete paper or a submission-derived manuscript.
| Field | Source record |
|---|---|
| Permanent ID | CL-ACA-005 |
| Canonical version | V2.4 |
| Layer | Interdisciplinary introduction |
| Candidate route | CN-first |
| Batch | C |
| Registry execution state | PUBLICATION_AUTHORIZED / SUBMISSION_STATUS_UNVERIFIED |
| Full-text publication and versions | AUTHOR_AUTHORIZED_PUBLICATION |
Professional scrutiny can change the upstream theory
The nineteen Canonical works have reciprocal relationships with upstream theory, public entries and practical projects. Professional work tests evidence, boundaries and counterexamples. Changes to central propositions must return to controlled Canonical versioning; submission adaptations must not silently rewrite the theory.
Related public entries
Read the English professional explanation
- Humanity’s Civilizational Choice in the AGI Era: return from interdisciplinary judgment to direction and real questions
- The current AGI-COS version map: connect judgment with controlled engineering and governance
- Human-COS public explanation: connect judgment with consequences, responsibility and real actors
Public history remains part of the publication record
Full-text publication is authorized by the author. See each work for verified downloads and versions. Historical records do not establish current submission or review status.
Source and reading scope
This page translates the existing public web explanation, not an unpublished manuscript. Its source is the Chinese public page in the saved main baseline 43ef8de. Linked works retain their own publication boundaries. Chinese source page.