AGI-COS version map
When AGI-COS has multiple versions, stages, communication texts and technical texts, determine which document is valid for which task rather than treating version numbers as an upgrade sequence.
There is no “highest” or “latest” version covering every task. AGI-COS versions form professional tracks around different directions, problems, stages and environmental phases. Versions may be used together; permissions may not be stacked. A higher version number must not invalidate still-effective professional capabilities in a lower-numbered version.
When AGI-COS has multiple versions, stages, communication texts and technical texts, determine which document is valid for which task rather than treating version numbers as an upgrade sequence.
How should technical implementation, governance boundaries and real-world actors be separated within AGI-COS as a civilization-level protocol stack for safe operation?
When high irreversible risk has entered a crisis window, how should detection, judgment, window assessment, impact mapping, path design, execution, recovery and learning be carried out?
In high-consequence judgment, how can model outputs carry sources, confidence levels, data lineage and declarations of unknowns, instead of being treated as facts?
How can event response develop into continuous sensing, red-team-triggered downgrading, recovery learning, distributed trials and multi-node civilizational immunity?
Once AGI becomes infrastructure, how can irreversible optimization, diminished subjecthood, shrinking meaning and civilizational stagnation be avoided?
How can a stable civilization retain failure, conflict, shadows, low-tech resilience and antifragility, rather than turning “perfect stability” into a new vulnerability?
Under multiplanetary and interstellar conditions, how should light-speed delays, distributed coordination, civilizational memory, value drift and multi-node autonomy be addressed?
Across extremely long timescales, how can final states, institutional rigidity, broken memory, stagnant meaning and the ossification of guardians themselves be avoided?
The following versions have independent professional value, but no new permanent asset IDs have been assigned without authorization. They are accessed through this family page and remain subject to the current authority and isolation boundaries of the continuity audit.
| Version | Direction | Current controlled interpretation | Source text |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 | Ecological resilience / cognitive and adversarial resilience | Retain layered presentation, cognitive-load optimization, defenses against adversarial data and model attacks, social feedback and second-order effects. “Social resonance” must not become psychological manipulation or the shaping of public opinion. | Original-version PDF · English PDF |
| 2.1 | Global coordination / principal near-term professional track | An engineering integration of 1.x and 2.0 for policy submission, international discussion, MEU and crisis intervention. Policy communication texts remain subordinate to the professional source text and create no new permissions. | Original-version PDF · English PDF |
| 2.2 | Deployment and technical-interface reference track | Retain identity, authorization, auditing, sunset provisions, fail-safe behavior, privacy and verification nodes. Historical implementations involving specific latency targets, 72-hour periods, blockchain or IPFS require renewed validation against reality. | Original-version PDF · English PDF |
| 4.1 | Supplementary research on interstellar resilience and memory | Retain memory of failures, repair of distant conflicts, local-failure isolation, low-tech continuity and stress tests for AI capability drift. Mechanisms conferring final ethical sovereignty on AGI or governing authority through behavioral scoring remain isolated. | Original-version PDF · English PDF |
| Ω+ | Dynamic-eternity thought-experiment track | Retain attention to guardian recursion, the sacredness of the unknown and the risks of overprotection. Challenge Injection, compulsory abandonment of goals and deliberately creating crises remain isolated mechanisms. | Original-version PDF · English PDF |
AGI-COS is infrastructure for cognition, risk and coordination, not a new sovereignty. No track gains authority to set civilizational goals, sovereign power to act in the world, authority to adjudicate meaning, or permanent temporary powers merely by being more capable, having a higher version number or entering a crisis.
This page translates the public web description. Complete English translations of the listed family components are available below. This does not assert completeness of the entire family.
Each attachment is a complete English translation of its named source track, with its own version and role. These tracks coexist; version numbers are not an upgrade ladder. No one attachment represents the entire identity or family, and completeness of the entire identity or family is not asserted. These family components have no new permanent manuscript IDs.
English source track 1.2 · 1.2 · Ecological, cognitive and adversarial resilience
English source track 2.1 · 2.1 · Global coordination and near-term professional track
English source track 2.2 · 2.2 · Deployment and technical interface reference
English source track 4.1 · 4.1 · Interstellar resilience and memory research supplement
English source track Ω+ · Ω+ · Dynamic eternity thought experiment