Current Chinese public page and public-documents.json agree on P06-EXPERIMENT-001, V0.8. The English HTML follows that source. The current canonical register has been reconciled to those identities; superseded registry fields remain preserved as historical provenance. English PDF availability is stated separately below.
Use four progressively authorized decision levels to organize three overarching goals, six systems, phase discipline, seven forms of group dynamics, rights firewalls, data and evidence, responsibility chains, stopping and rollback. This proposes entry into national research and preliminary study of candidate areas, not an authorized implementation plan.
Civilization Leap’s theories and mechanisms cannot be validated by text alone, but national-level research cannot jump directly to implementation either. Research into issues, preliminary studies of candidate areas and integrated experiments must therefore be separated into stages, with rights, responsibility, data, stopping and rollback addressed from the outset.
This page proposes research and preliminary studies of candidate areas; it creates no government authorization. Passing any stage does not automatically authorize the next. Real actors, jurisdiction, budgets and responsibility must be specified separately.
Organize research questions, joint validation, baseline studies of candidate areas, hypotheses and counterfactuals, participant rights, stage gates, stopping and rollback.
It cannot be presented as an approved implementation plan, name any city as an already established candidate area, or tie contribution or model scores to basic rights and political power.
Validate stage by stage using baselines, counterfactuals, independent evidence, reviews of participant rights and stage gates. Failures, minority views and counterexamples must be retained.
If any stage gate fails, rights are harmed, data or responsibility is inadequate, exit is infeasible or risk exceeds its threshold, stop rather than proceed to the next level of authorization.
Results must feed back into the scope of policy, experimental design and upstream mechanisms. Reality has the right to refute theory.
Explains why the state should allow Civilization Leap to enter systematic research, the levels of current decisions, how the six major systems would be jointly validated, and how rights, phases, data, responsibility, stopping, and rollback should be addressed in advance.
Recognize the issue → establish an interdisciplinary research mechanism → conduct candidate-city baseline surveys and preliminary research → only after those conditions pass, decide whether to authorize a comprehensive experiment. Approval at any level does not automatically authorize the next.
This text defines the current policy scope and authorization boundaries; E001-V0.2 defines hypotheses, baselines, evidence, stage gates, stopping, and rollback. Neither replaces the other.
Corrections to ownership/use rights and the design source for E001.
Contains strong rules on ownership, contributions, and rights that were later corrected.
Early structure of national authorization, city-level hosting, and the six major systems.
Update under the relevant triggers when actual authorization, actors, jurisdictions, budgets, rights, AGI capabilities, experimental results, or failure conditions change. Local adaptation changes the national master text only when shared assumptions are falsified.
This page translates the public web description. The reviewed English manuscript is available in the English PDF section below; its source edition is identified there.
Download the English PDF · V0.8