Resource pools
Distinguish ownership from actual use, allowing idle resources to serve public value under voluntary, auditable arrangements with the right to exit.
View the family descriptionEarlier source terminology
The resource-pool card quotes the earlier V1.0 source, including its language of altruistic outcomes and compulsory translation of incentives. This differs from the current formulation, “self-interest with others first.” The source wording is retained for review; it neither cancels self-interest nor silently revises the original work. See the current resource-pool family for the relationship between the early exploration and later conceptual tracks.
PUBLIC DOMAIN
Resources, contribution and institutional engineering
Study how resources enter actual use, contributions are sustained and power is structurally constrained.
Work families and responsibilities
Contribution-value system
Prevent real contributions from disappearing unnoticed, while making clear that contribution value is not a personal score and cannot purchase basic rights.
View the family descriptionSeparation of three powers and civilizational decision-making
Constrain the expansion of human and intelligent-system power by structurally separating the powers to propose, judge and execute.
View the family descriptionMeaning economy
Study how participation, contribution, relationships and meaning can provide new social support under structural unemployment.
View the family descriptionDream Garden and transition modules
Study how aspirations, capabilities, resources and coordination enter real settings that can be tested and rolled back.
View the family descriptionCurrent public reading
Only currently valid public works are listed here. Internal drafts, transitional drafts and revision records are not published on the public site.
Resources, contribution and institutional engineering
Civilization Leap: Resource-Pool Meta-Rules for the AGI Era
— The underlying logic of moving from selfish contests over existing stocks toward broadly beneficial altruistic outcomes. This document establishes meta-rules for resource allocation in Civilization Leap. It argues that as AGI drives exponential productivity growth, relations of production centered on selfishness, possession and monopoly over existing stocks obstruct the broad sharing of intelligence’s benefits. The architecture does not seek to reform subjective morality; it proposes one-way causal translation rules in the infrastructure of resource flows, compelling rational self-interested nodes’ motives for gain to yield objectively beneficial, strongly entropy-reducing social outcomes. It systematically discusses resources, contribution and the leap…
Translation scope
This is a translation of the existing public web page. A description of a work is not its full manuscript. Source publication and version labels describe the Chinese work; they do not claim an English full-text edition is available. Unavailable English texts and downloads are marked explicitly.